They say it’s better to light a candle than to curse the darkness. However, they never tell you that doing the former is much harder than doing the latter.
It is an article of faith on the American right that progressives have wrecked our major cities. Conservatives have long argued that members of the political and academic left are wholly to blame for dysfunctional public schools, rampant crime, an explosion in single motherhood and other social conditions that contribute to the meanness of America’s city streets.
Yet it’s not enough to declare that progressives bear full responsibility for the problems of our troubled cities. Saying that the Democratic Party created these problems doesn’t lead to solutions. Asserting that liberal policies drove capital out of the cities won’t drive capital back in.
We’re in the midst of great political change in this country—but that change is not likely to reach our major cities. Too many politicians in these cities rule without challenge, staying in power for years, even decades. With no real competition, these leaders can afford to turn a blind eye, a deaf ear and a cold heart to the chronic problems facing their locales.
These cities are the places were change is needed the most—but how can that change come?
There must be some way to bring that change to our major cities. There must be some way to bring new ideas, new competition, new standards to areas of the country that cry out for improvement. There must be some way to bring some measure of ideological diversity to cities dominated by one philosophy and one way of doing things.
This won’t be easy. This can’t be easy. Perhaps only a moderate amount of change can be accomplished. Perhaps the major cities, by definition, cannot fully embrace the limited-government vision most conservatives prefer. Perhaps the best one can hope for is a partial victory. Fair enough: that’s better than losing outright.
Our goal is to find a way to make change a reality in America’s major cities. It’s not right that so much political, economic and cultural potential remains untapped because of poor leadership in these regions. It’s not just that so many have to deal with the problems created by one-philosophy rule. It’s not wise for new generations to be held back by old ways.
Hard as it is, it’s much better to light a candle than to curse the darkness. So let’s strike a match.
For all the blight that exists in the cities, when it comes to major decisions on finance and governance, the major centers of power are located within cities. So you end up with two worlds: the “townies,” who overwhelmingly vote Democratic and are left abandoned to their hopeless devices; and the captains of capital and regulation, who honestly don’t live that life. Conservatives need to find a way to “see” the former and understand how they see the world. By “see,” I mean we trumpet rhetoric of the “American Dream” and rejecting government control and individual liberty, but have we stopped to think that those terms mean something very differently to someone who lives in constant violence and abject poverty, with filthy, drug-ridden streets and slum neighborhoods. For all the expensive problems with George W. Bush’s “compassionate conservativism,” it had some capacity to resonate—probably much moreso than the GOP’s current “Pledge to America”—because it offered a sense that conservatives cared about more than themselves. The “Pledge” calls for tax cuts and limiting the growth of government, but when you live in a world where you grow up believing that you can only survive with government help and the only public figures you even see in your neighborhood are either hacks who give out your benefits, or the Democratic liberals who, while responsible largely for your situation, at least feign an interaction and connection with you, why should you believe and believe in conservatives? Democrats get that. Sure, their politicians still schmooze with the corporate bigwigs and drive fancy cars and even live in the burbs in Mcmansions and don’t send their kids to public schools, but they show up. They show up at the neighborhood baseball, basketball, and soccer games. They show up at church services and area block parties. They show up with kids are mowed down by gun violence, knowing full well that the people who killed the 25-year-old men and women and 15- and 5-year-old boys and girls did not go through a background check, do not have gun licenses, and do not keep their firearms locked securely in a box, separated from the ordnance that broke that fallen body and snuffed out a life. Where are we?
ReplyDeleteBooker Rising introduced your blog today, so here I am.
ReplyDeleteUrban areas are populated by a different breed of people than smaller political districts. Add this to the necessary increase in complexity associated with densly populated areas, governance of urban areas are much more daunting challenge; a challenge that beyond the talents and resources available.
Some isolated communities within an urban areas manage to do better than surrounding communities. Ironically, those same communities seem to be liberal...at least politically. I think you'll find that in order to preserve their communities, there must be a strong conservative will embedded somewhere.
D.R.T.:
ReplyDeleteThe first construct that I wish to posit upon your site is a framework that you need to consider as the observed "permanent interests" for all Black people (all people) regardless of ideology or class:
* Safe Streets so that they can congregate in peace with their neighbors and build up their social fabric
* Quality schools so that the next generation of children can become the professional service agents for the community per the discipline afforded them
* Thriving Local Economies so that a market place is established where people trade their talents for salary and the community is enhanced as it has the financing necessary to build up its infrastructure
* Healthy lifestyle and relationship outcomes so that the people can live long, disease-free and rich lives along with the people they commune with. These relationships synergize into a greater whole
I then add two constraining points that direct the choices toward more fruitful pursuits
* Solutions that are COMPREHENSIVE and ENDURING - able to impanel everyone who desires to eat the fruit to commit to the repetitive tasks to allow them to move closer to their goal
* Solutions that build up the COMPETENCIES of the people by leveraging the human resources within our community as the primary vehicle by which our progress is made. Thus the proper MANAGEMENT of these resources is required as they are essential agents in the attainment of the end goal
The best thing that any "Conservative" can do for the inner city is to had to them a BETTER FRAMEWORK FOR LIVING. Tap upon their EQUAL HUMANITY and get them to buy into that which will build them up. This was the essence of Marcus Garvey - giving hope to those who had none BUT ALSO having them to invest in themselves (NOT into a party or ideology as is the case today).
I am not totally sold on your engagement model as I do see what YOU ASK OF THE "EQUAL HUMAN BEING" that is within these desperate circumstances. If he is not engaged as a full partner then you have already lost as you have failed to distinguish yourselves from the "Progressives who are Democrats who are Black".
I just read a web site in which they are aligning their strategy for BLACK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT with the actions of the Democratic Party.
IF you dare set foot on "their turf", despite your most transparent intentions advertised - do you think that they will not act as the "clan forces" hoping to turn you away?
The RANK AND FILE needs to be made to demand what you have enlightened them to, thus disposing of this Progressive Overlay.
I'm an urbanite by upbringing, but a suburbanite by current residence. I live in a county, however, that is extremely liberal. The county council is overwhelmingly Democratic -- there have never been more than two Republicans since the council was set at nine members a couple of decades ago, and currently the partisan division is 9-0. The Republicans we do elect are mostly the type you would consider "urban" types; we had a Congresswoman named Connie Morella who served until the Democratic Governor, who could not bear to see a presidentially "blue" state with a 4-4 division of the Congressional delegation, and engineered an egregious gerrymander that left the division 6-2.
ReplyDeleteI'm concerned that separating the Republicans (or the Right) into urban and suburban leaves us totally abandoned. Many of the people who would be "your" type do live on this side of the urban/suburban line.